Wednesday, October 11, 2006

Lage Raho Munna Bhai


Lage Raho Munnabhai captures gandhi as a ghost from the past. Both as a part of the plot as well as the larger message that it delivers. Gandhi today, is just a ghost from the past. But attributing the soul of a nation to a single person is utter nonsense. Gandhi himself said: "I have nothing new to teach the world. Truth and non-violence are as old as hills."

The media needs some masala to latch onto and produce kilobytes out of that. Producers are not complaining though as any publicty that comes for free is welcome. More so, because filmi munna is awaiting real world justice very shortly. Today only, a lady in our organisation suggested a gandhigiri for pigeonhole mailbox cluttered with mail. The idea was to individually deliver the uncollected mail with a 'gandhigiri' thankyou note. The 'Gandhigiri' idea has been taken from the story of a person who was travelling to meet Gandhi (incidentally, with Gandhi travelling in same compartment). He was continuosly spitting and gandhi picked the spit each time. well, what gandhi did was because of a genuine inner feeling. If one tries to recollect, one may find other such instances of getting the best out of others by genuinely replying negative actions with positive ones. But if one tries to fake oneself and do 'gandhigiri' because some gandhigiri guy has preached it to one it seems like pure arrogance. Hence neither will it bear any positive results nor will it be sustainable. The 'get well soon' message seems to be an agonising taunt and not a genuine concern for a sick person.
The advice to the taxi driver and the bride is no different than what any sane agony aunt will give.
The human values that this movie portrays are in no way different than those shown in previous munnabhai: the dignity of labor(the sweeper), the respect for human life(the suicide attempt), the dislike for silly bureacratic procedure(filling forms while a person dies), raising voice against dehumanising a person by making him a 'subject' (anand bhai the 'mental'). Gandhi would have stood by all of these values. Only difference is that brand mahatma and gandhigiri was not there last time.
An interesting question to ask would be that how is this movie doing in pakistan? I guess not so good as the previous one. Because 'their' values are different than ours. For 'them', gandhi does not exist: neither as a ghost nor as a thinker. Thanks to 'their' 'education system' the memory of entire generation of our common freedom fighters has been wiped off. As against last time, there have been no reports of munnabhai in pakistan. Is it the book of musharraf or 'gandhigiri' which is the reason? or maybe bhailog is too busy analysing bombay bomb blast verdict to have found time to smuggle the 'useless' movie to Pakistan?

Sunday, October 08, 2006

Pyar ke Side Effects

Finally, i got to see one of the most hyped of the low budget movies this season. The biggest hype-factor for the movie was Mallika Sherwat in a supposedly deglamourised girl-next-door role.
I guess the hypes are not always correct. Mallika Sherawat, as an actress, disappointes yet again.
Deglam? I dont think so(for those who flock to watch her movies, dont worry, the lip-locks are here too)
Girl-next-door? umm, well I dont know, I havent had any girl next door to me, and especially none in the neighbourhood to have run away from her marriage.

Mallika Sherawat apart, this movie is a watchable affair with Rahul Bose and Ranvir Shorey giving delightful performances. The story deals with the life of a bachelor who is in love and he goes onto explain to the audience the side effect of being in this "wonderful" relation, inclusive of all commitment-phobias that the males are supposed to suffer from.
Rahul Bose, as the Sutradhaar of the movie is brilliant in patches but maintains his panache consistently.
Ranvir Shorey, once again after Mixed Doubles, shows his great natural talent at comedy and I am sure he has a good career ahead of him.

Overall, watch it for the occasional laughter if you have two hours to spare. All the males who have been in a relationship are sure to find something or the other quite close to reality.

What to watch out for: Ranvir Shorey
What to ignore: Mallika Sherawat
My Rating: 5.5/10

Behind Enemy Lines: Axis of Evil

Aaah, the age of sequels continues...
But, James Dodson misses what Vidhu Vinod Chopra had used. The sequel has the shadow and the expectation of the first to overcome, therefore it must be better. Much Better.

That is not the case with Behind Enemy Lines. The same old story of a mission being called off in the final stages leaving a handful of US defense personnel(U.S. Navy SEALs in this part) in enemy territory(North Korea). After being told to lie low, they land up in trouble and somehow accomplish the mission which was thought to be better accomplished by other means.
When you have such your theme cut out, there is not much you can do in a war-action movie. Realising that, I could not help but admire how the screenplay keeps you engrossed. It is as fast paced as the first one, and the cinematography in some places is just too good. And I will not say that for many movies with a shaky camera, but here, the effect has been used to perfection.

What to watch out for: The camerawork in the enemy territory.
What to try and ignore: The similarities in the story line.

My Rating: 5/10